← OIM JournalTWO SCALES

If the Victim Is a Man, Which Door Opens?

Two systems built for the same problem — domestic violence and workplace harassment — and what happens when you change one variable.

OIM ANALYSISPUBLISHED 08 SEPT 20268 min

Take one man. Put him through two ordinary crises: violence inside his home, and harassment at his desk. In both cases, change only one variable — his sex — and ask what the statute books actually do.

Door one: the home

A woman experiencing domestic violence has a dedicated civil statute built for exactly her situation: the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. It gives her fast, court-enforced protection orders, the right to stay in the shared household, and monetary relief — through a process designed to be quicker than a criminal trial.

A man in the same house, facing comparable violence, does not have a mirror statute. He is not without recourse — general criminal offences and civil remedies can still apply depending on what actually happened to him — but he is not handed the same purpose-built machinery.

Door two: the office

A woman harassed at work has a dedicated statutory complaint mechanism: the POSH Act’s Internal Committee process, built specifically for her.

A man harassed at work does not have that same statutory door. Many employers extend an equivalent internal process to everyone as a matter of policy — which is worth knowing, and worth asking your own employer about — but that is a company choice, not a right written into the POSH Act itself.

What this is not saying

It is not saying men have “no protection” in either scenario. General criminal law, contract law, and employer policy all still operate. It is not saying either statute is wrong to exist — both respond to well-documented, specific patterns of harm against women that justified a dedicated legal architecture.

It is saying something narrower and more useful: if you assumed the underlying legal machinery was symmetrical by default, it is not, in either of these two very ordinary situations. That is worth knowing before you need it.

What to check next

If either scenario ever applies to you, the first useful question is not “is this fair” — it is “which specific door is actually open to me, and what does it require.” Start with your employer’s own policy, and with a lawyer who can tell you which general provisions apply to your specific facts.

LAW CHECKED · 08 SEPT 2026

Published 8 September 2026. This is an OIM editorial piece, not case-specific legal advice.